misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided by the decision in the Supreme Court during the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking during the present case. In this sort of circumstances, this petition is found to get not maintainable and it is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and utilize Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It is vital for society to understand the gravity of this offense plus the need for stringent punishment to deter possible offenders and guarantee justice for the victims and their families.
limitation of liability towards the extent of the cap provided by the registered mortgage deed(Banking Law)
Deterrence: The worry of severe effects, which include capital punishment, is meant to discourage opportunity criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is essential in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.
Now it is properly-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are totally different, therefore, in our view the figured out Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner through the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is usually a nicely-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
be proven without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is really a horrifying reality, a very reduced threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
Upholding Justice: The application of your law as well as the subsequent punishment of your guilty party supply a perception of closure and justice into the sufferer’s family and loved ones.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of the boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf on the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for your dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all acting in their Work with DCFS.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent plus the case under appeal, Probably overruling the previous case regulation by setting a whole new precedent of higher authority. This might take place several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later from the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his improvement in the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.
Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and balance. It demonstrates the commitment from the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of legislation.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to the person, by doing an act which within the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently unsafe that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death with the this kind of person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and fork out fixation will not be entertainable for your reasons that these kinds of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, and the legal grounds for this petition are inadequate as such this petition is dismissed, which will involve disputed claims and counterclaims on the subject post, therefore this court will not be inside a position to dilate upon this kind of disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” get more info wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--